mogdmb писал(а):
Nevertheless I see the main problem not in the economy but in people.Modern hi-tech economy does not need a lot of manpower. And really creative people were never numerous.
We will not build modern high technological economy from day to day, manpower still needed. It will be rather like a long-term aim, even for future generations.
Цитата:
(Me personally, I'm not a partisan of liberal paradigm,because it sounds like social darvinism. It's possible to embellish it with "corporate social responsibility" but the essence remains the same. Equality of opportunity does not mean equality of outcome. But it's off-topic here.)
It is a famous discussion between Rawls and Nozick. I have always claimed that social inequality is the main reason of development. Maybe it sounds like a social darvinism, for some of us immoral, but why? I'm deeply interested in this area, spent weeks of my life reading about Chicago Boys in Chile, Deng-Xiao Ping in China and about the basics of United States. Nothing more effective than this.
Цитата:
- the strategic goals and directions of common foreign policy of Confederation;
Our first goal is to weaken Russia, so we must focus on strenghten relationships with USA and China. Intelligence should stir up trouble in Chechnya, separatism inside Russia will help us on the next level to confederate with Ukraine (surely they'll have problems with Russian minority, as a majority at the East- Donieck and South- Crimea). We must use European Union (as long as it will be exist) to block Russia in continental Europe, especially Gasprom and national Russian corporations to prevent them from taking over infrastructure and strategical companies. We must come back to idea of
Intermarium and work on this loose confederation, slowly welcoming other countries aware of this necessity. As I said before,
there is one crucial position among geopolitical books which is a must. I added link with book in English, feel free to download and read by clicking the green button "pobierz".
Цитата:
the strategic goals of common defense plan;
Write a scenario against war with Russia to hold them for at least 2 weeks; i don't predict any other threats, the only threat may be a conventional assault on Belarus. Russia will stop on the Bug, not willing to risk a real confrontation with NATO. So: keep hard resistance on Belarus.
Цитата:
the principles of common army formation and command;
I don't think we should unite our formations, common maneuvers will be sufficient. We must re-locate units on Belarus and adjustour military doctrine to local conditions- forrests, mud.
Цитата:
"becoming a noteworthy country for global players" means the readiness to undertake greater responsibility in regional / global affairs. How do you assess the challenges and risks for Confederation?
Such Confederation will be a natural regional leader.
The greatest challenge is to create a Headquarter of intelligent and wise people with a vision and idea. If we don't manage to do so, then we will drawn in our desires. This is the greatest risk- lack of political elites. To be honest, i don't see such people at the horizon. But keep praying for miracle, these people are surely borned and they're waiting for their chance.